Sleeping Beauty

The philosophical community in the United States is increasingly focused on the Sleeping Beauty Problem:

Some researchers are going to put you to sleep. During the two days that your sleep will last, they will briefly wake you up either once or twice, depending on the toss of a fair coin (Heads: once; Tails: twice). After each waking, they will put you to back to sleep with a drug that makes you forget that waking. When you are first awakened, to what degree ought you believe that the outcome of the coin toss is Heads?  

UPDATE: There’s an excellent web page devoted to sleeping beauty and related issues here

3 thoughts on “Sleeping Beauty

  1. I don’t get why “thirders” think “halvers” do not have probability on their side. Will you explain this please? I’m very right brained. I can also see why someone might say that it is equally probably that both views are correct, but . . . . HELP!

    Also, is the next digit, 1221? That seems one possible correct response; i.e., simply a quantifying of the previous digit.

  2. I don’t know what to think of this puzzle, myself. I think there’s a reasonable argument for either position, and it seems possible to Dutch book either position, so it’s hard to know what rationality demands here. Some people have strong intuitions; I lean toward being a “thirder,” but it’s a weak leaning.

    On the third math puzzle: there are of course infinitely many sequences that start with 1, 11, 21, 1211, but the next number of the sequence I had in mind is 111221.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s