Alex Brill and Alan Viard show that Obama’s tax plan raises rates sharply, not only for the wealthy, but for most of the middle class. (HT: Greg Mankiw)
-
Top Posts
Categories
- Academia
- Advertising
- Art
- Cars
- Cats
- Children
- Distributive Justice
- Dogs
- economics
- Education
- Equality
- ethics
- Europe
- foreign policy
- Health
- History
- justice
- law
- liberty
- Literature
- mathematics
- Music
- national security
- Organizations
- philosophy
- Politics
- Rationality
- regulation
- Religion
- Rhetoric
- rights
- science
- Sports
- terrorism
- Truth
- Uncategorized
- war
Blogroll
Archives
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Meta
I am one of the authors of the article about Obama’s tax plan that is mentioned here. I want to clarify that our article does not find “middle class tax increases” under Obama’s plan in the sense of higher tax payments by the middle class. As our article makes clear, most people would pay lower taxes under Obama’s plan because he would cut taxes for the lower and middle classes.
The point of our article, available at
http://www.american.com/archive/2008/august-08-08/the-folly-of-obama2019s-tax-plan
is that Obama’s tax cuts are designed in ways that raise MARGINAL tax rates and therefore reduce incentives to earn income. The marginal rate rises because the size of the tax cut falls as income rises. But, tax payments are lower under Obama’s plan (than under current law) at all of the income levels discussed in our article. The statement in this post that Obama’s tax plan “raises rates” should be amended to “raises marginal rates.”
Alan D. Viard, Resident Scholar
American Enterprise Institute
Thanks for the correction.